This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles Manuscripts submitted to BMC Public Health are assessed by our editors and/or peer reviewers. All published articles are peer-reviewed. Overall editorial responsibility for the journal is with the Editor with Editorial Board Members acting as handling editors · I wish to explain that even in the case of minor revisions the revised manuscript is usually reviewed by the reviewers after the initial editorial assessment. Based on the response from the reviewers the editor takes a final decision. Hence in your case the decision will be made by the editor after he receives the comments from the reviewers
BMC Public Health | Peer-review policy
Research note is the main article type of BMC Research Notes and is suitable for. Authors must clearly acknowledge any work upon which they are buildingboth published and unpublished. Studies reporting descriptive results from a single institution will only be considered if analogous data have not been previously published in a peer reviewed journal and the conclusions provide distinct insights that are of relevance to a regional or international audience, editorial assessment bmc.
BMC Research Notes does not consider systematic reviews or meta-analyses. These should be published as full research articles in one of our BMC Series sister journals.
Additional editorial assessment bmc apply if your manuscript describes a software tool or data management plan. Please click on the respective link below to view these. These manuscripts should be submitted as a research note. Image integrity and standards Cropped gels and blots can be included in editorial assessment bmc main text if it improves the clarity and conciseness of the presentation. In such cases, the cropping of the blot must be clearly evident and must be mentioned in the figure legend.
Corresponding uncropped full-length gels and blot should be included in the supplementary information. These uncropped images should editorial assessment bmc where they were cropped, be labelled as in the main text and placed in a single supplementary figure. Further information can be found under 'Digital image integrity' which are detailed on our Standards of Editorial assessment bmc page.
Data sharing BMC Research Notes strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely should be available to readers. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories where available and appropriate or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible.
Where a widely established research community expectation for data archiving in public repositories exists, submission to a community-endorsed, public repository is mandatory. A list of data where deposition is required, with the appropriate repositories, can be found on the Editorial Policies Page.
Data sharing BMC Research Notes strongly supports open research, including transparency and openness in reporting. Further details of our Data availability policy can be found on the journal's About page, editorial assessment bmc.
Authors who need help depositing data may wish to contact our Research Data Support Helpdesk. The use of the service is optional and does not imply or guarantee that a manuscript will be accepted. The information below details the section headings that you should include in your manuscript and the information required within each section.
For a one-page summary of what a research note article should look like, please click here. List of abbreviation, declarations, references, editorial assessment bmc, figures, figure headings, figure legends, tables, table headings and table legends do not count towards the above stated word limits.
For all research involving human subjects, written informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under BMC Research Notes does not consider research where only verbal informed consent has been obtained. Please limit the number of tables and figures in your manuscript to 3 in order to be consistent with a note article type.
The abstract should not exceed words. Please minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the abstract. The abstract must include the following separate sections:. If the data presented is a single observation or the side product of another research project then authors should state this in the abstract under objective. If the data presented is a single observation or the side product of another research project then authors should state this in the introduction.
This will not negatively impact editorial assessment editorial assessment bmc BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles, editorial assessment bmc. Authors should not provide a general review of the related literature but instead cite relevant work if the manuscript extends previously published or unpublished research.
For data management plans, the introduction should briefly summarize the research project for which the data management plan was written.
This should contain the body of the research note, and may also be broken into subsections with short and informative headings. Methods should be described in sufficient detail to allow repeatability. Authors should concisely describe the data or results they present and provide a critical discussion of the findings within the context of the research field.
If an observation cannot be explained or put in context of the current literature then authors are encouraged to state that. BMC Research Notes considers scientifically valid manuscripts irrespective of the interest of a study or its likely impact, editorial assessment bmc. In order to ensure submissions to BMC Research Notes are of maximum benefit to the research editorial assessment bmc, authors should editorial assessment bmc state the limitations of their work.
If abbreviations are used in the text they should be defined in the text at first use, and a list of abbreviations should be provided.
Please see below for details on the information to be included in these sections. If any of the sections are not relevant to your manuscript, editorial assessment bmc, please include the heading and write 'Not applicable' for that section. Studies involving animals must include a statement on ethics approval and for experimental studies involving client-owned animals, authors must also include a statement on informed consent from the client or owner. See our editorial policies for more information, editorial assessment bmc.
All presentations of case reports must have consent for publication. You can use your institutional consent form or our consent form if you prefer. You should not send the form to us on submission, editorial assessment bmc, but we may request to see a copy at any stage including after publication. See our editorial policies for more information on consent for publication.
Data availability statements should editorial assessment bmc information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found including, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study.
By data we editorial assessment bmc the minimal dataset that would be necessary to interpret, replicate and build upon the findings reported in the article, editorial assessment bmc. We recognise it is not always possible to share research data publicly, for instance when individual privacy could be compromised, and in such instances data availability should editorial assessment bmc be stated in the manuscript along with any conditions for access.
Data availability statements can take one of the following forms or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets :. More examples of template data availability statements, which include examples of openly available and restricted access datasets, are available here.
BioMed Central also requires that authors cite any publicly available data on which the conclusions of the paper rely in the manuscript. Data citations should include a persistent identifier such as a DOI and should ideally be included in the reference list. Citations of datasets, when they appear in the reference list, should include the minimum information recommended by DataCite and follow journal style.
Dataset identifiers including DOIs should be expressed as full URLs, editorial assessment bmc. For example:, editorial assessment bmc. Hao Z, AghaKouchak A, Nakhjiri N, Farahmand A. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system GIDMaPS data sets. Editorial assessment bmc you wish editorial assessment bmc co-submit a data note describing your data to be published in BMC Research Notesyou can do so editorial assessment bmc visiting our submission portal, editorial assessment bmc.
Data notes support open data and help authors to comply with funder policies on data sharing. Co-published data notes will be linked to the research article the data support example, editorial assessment bmc. See our editorial policies for a full explanation of competing interests. If you are unsure whether you or any of your co-authors have a competing interest please contact the editorial office. If you do not have any competing interests, please state "The authors declare that they have no competing interests" in this section.
All sources of funding for the research reported should be declared. The role of the funding body in the design of the study and collection, analysis, editorial assessment bmc, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript should be declared.
The individual contributions of authors to the manuscript should be specified in editorial assessment bmc section. Guidance and criteria for authorship can be found in our editorial policies. Please use initials to refer to each author's contribution in this section, for example: "FC analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the hematological disease and the transplant. RH performed the histological examination of the kidney, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Please acknowledge anyone who contributed towards the article who does not meet the criteria for authorship including anyone who provided professional writing services or materials.
Authors should obtain permission to acknowledge from all those mentioned in the Acknowledgements section. See our editorial policies for a full explanation of acknowledgements and authorship criteria.
Please add authors in the format First Name, Middle initial s optionalLast Name. You can add institution or country information for each author if you wish, editorial assessment bmc, but this should be consistent across all authors. Please note that individual names may not be present in the PubMed record at the time a published article is initially included in PubMed editorial assessment bmc it takes PubMed additional time to code this information.
You may choose to use this section to include any relevant information about the author s that editorial assessment bmc aid the reader's interpretation of the article, and understand the standpoint of the author s. This may include details about the authors' qualifications, current positions they hold at institutions or societies, or any other relevant background information.
Please refer to authors using their initials. Note this section should not be used to describe any competing interests, editorial assessment bmc. Footnotes can be used to give additional information, which may include the citation of a reference included in the reference list. They should not consist solely of a reference citation, and they should never include the bibliographic details of a reference, editorial assessment bmc. They should also not contain any figures or tables.
Footnotes to the text are numbered consecutively; those to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data, editorial assessment bmc. Footnotes to the title or the authors of the article are not given reference symbols, editorial assessment bmc.
See our editorial policies for author guidance on good citation practice. Web links and URLs: All web links and URLs, including links to the authors' own websites, should be given a reference number and included in the reference list rather than within the text of the manuscript. They should be provided in full, including both the title of the site and the URL, as well as the date the site was accessed, in the following format: The Mouse Tumor Biology Database.
Accessed 20 May If an author or group of authors can clearly be associated with a web link, editorial assessment bmc, such as for weblogs, then they should be included in the reference. Rohrmann S, Overvad K, editorial assessment bmc, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Jakobsen MU, editorial assessment bmc, Egeberg R, Tjønneland A, et al.
Meat consumption and mortality - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Medicine.
Developmental Edit vs. Editorial Assessment: Which Is Right for You?
, time: 10:30Editorial policies
This will not negatively impact editorial assessment as BMC Research Notes aims to make single observations available to the scientific community. We are not looking for a detailed and lengthy introduction to the topic and authors should instead cite relevant review articles · I wish to explain that even in the case of minor revisions the revised manuscript is usually reviewed by the reviewers after the initial editorial assessment. Based on the response from the reviewers the editor takes a final decision. Hence in your case the decision will be made by the editor after he receives the comments from the reviewers BMC is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and endorses the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Policy Statement on Geopolitical Intrusion on Editorial Decisions
No comments:
Post a Comment